Skip to content

Legal struggle

The second court decision! The verdict (Art.263), which convicted a person for violation of a non-existent law, was cancelled

For the second time, the appellate court overturns the court verdict, which does not refer to the law that could have been violated. A person filing an appeal asks which law and whose right he/she has violated, which the state recognizes as a criminal offender.

It seems that it is with such strong-willed decisions that the real judicial reform will begin, when judges have the courage to destroy the Soviet tradition. We publish the text in full.

Appeal court ruling p.1
The decision of the court of appeal pp. 1
Court of Appeal ruling p.2
Court of Appeal ruling pg. 2
Court of Appeal ruling p.3
The decision of the court of appeal pp. 3

ORDERED:
Appeals of the prosecutor and the accused PERSON_2 against the verdict of the Ternopil City District Court of Ternopil region. dated March 30, 2017. to satisfy in part. The verdict of the Ternopil City Court of Ternopil region. dated March 30, 2017. against PERSON_2, accused under Part 1 of Art.263 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine – to cancel with the appointment of a new trial in the court of first instance in a different composition of the court.

As we know, tradition is stronger than the law, so judges who defend the law contrary to the Soviet tradition deserve special gratitude.

We invite supporters of the right to defense to send letters of support to the judges of the Court of Appeal of Ternopil region Kostruby G.I., Stadnyk O.B., Lekan I.E.

Author: Vitaliy Kolomiets
Attorneys at law “Orekhovskyi and Kolomiets”